One of the unique aspects to the spiritual discipline known as bhakti-yoga is that desire is not eliminated. Generally in any advanced spiritual discipline, the two concepts of jnana and vairagya, knowledge and renunciation, are put at the forefront. Knowledge relates to information about the soul, its nature, and its future destination. Vairagya refers to detachment from the demands of the senses. In either case, the issue of desire is not usually broached. If it is brought up at all, it is portrayed in a negative light. Desire is seen as a harmful thing; something which causes the innocent spirit soul to be led off course. The path towards salvation can be thought of in terms of a ship sailing off to sea. The demands of the senses represented by desire, or kama, can be thought of as the light of a golden treasure which pulls the ship off course. Since desire diverts a person from their intended destination, it is seen as something that needs to be quelled or at least controlled. But according to the highest authorities, those who have realized the ultimate transcendental pleasure in life, desire is something that needs to be purified rather than eliminated. When our desires are pointed towards the proper destination, both the good and bad effects of the senses can be transcended.
“The Supreme Lord said, The indestructible, transcendental living entity is called Brahman, and his eternal nature is called the self. Action pertaining to the development of these material bodies is called karma, or fruitive activities.” (Bhagavad-gita, 8.3)
A few examples can help us understand this concept more clearly. Telling the truth is generally equated with piety. Honesty is a virtue, so it is usually a good idea to tell the truth. Going back to the definition of karma, a pious act is something that results in a favorable condition at some point in the future. Thus telling the truth is meant to lead to a positive development of the material body. Honesty is considered an activity in the mode of goodness, or sattva-guna. According to Vedic information, those who live primarily in this mode ascend to the heavenly planets after their current life is over. To reside on a heavenly planet, one must possess a heavenly body. Possessing a heavenly body equates to heavenly enjoyment, and so on. Since increased enjoyment is seen as a favorable benefit, pious activities are recommended.
Let’s take another situation though. This situation occurs quite frequently and has thus formed the basis of much stereotypical male-female humor. It is quite common for a wife to ask the opinion of her husband in regards to an outfit she intends to wear. The question usually is phrased in this way: “Does this dress make me look fat?” Now what would the result be if the husband answered the question honestly, supposing that the dress did indeed serve to highlight the appearance of some rather unpleasant fatty areas on the body of the wife? Surely the wife would get offended if the husband told her the dress made her look fat. Her spirits would be dampened, she would feel unattractive, and she would surely be upset with the husband. There is a famous piece of advice given to men who have just gotten married: “If she ain’t happy, you ain’t happy.” By telling the wife that the dress makes her look fat, the husband makes the wife unhappy, and in turn has also made himself unhappy.
Regardless of the situation or the nature of the activity, for the desired result to be achieved, one must take action. This was the point stressed by Shri Lakshmana, the younger brother of Lord Rama. In the Vedic tradition, the Supreme Personality of Godhead is taken as one who kindly descends to earth from time to time. Every living entity can be considered God’s child, and therefore the elevated souls, those who are devotees of God, can surely help the conditioned souls, their brothers and sisters, get reacquainted with spiritual life. Nevertheless, under special circumstances, the Almighty Divine Entity, God Himself, decides to make a personal appearance on earth.
The uniqueness of the human body lies in the area of intelligence. In the body of a human being, the spirit soul can take to activities of intelligence, guided by the highest knowledge. This purified activity can lead to a change in consciousness, a condition which allows the soul to eventually return to its original home in the spiritual sky alongside God. While the jiva [individual] souls require an outer material covering to come to earth, the Supreme Lord doesn’t. Since matter was created by God, it can never affect Him in the same way that it does us. Therefore the bodies of His various incarnations, such as that of Lord Rama’s, remain completely spiritual. For God, there is no difference between body and spirit.
Fortunately, Rama’s younger brother Lakshmana was by His side. Lakshmana was essentially a twin copy of Rama, except that his bodily complexion was fair while Rama’s was dark. Lakshmana took service to Rama to be his only dharma in life. He listened to all the instructions that Rama gave Him during their youth. Like a good disciple, Lakshmana picked the perfect time to show his brother what he had learned. When Rama needed him most, Lakshmana was there.
Even with this uncertainty relating to karma, Lakshmana states that it is not possible for one to achieve their desired results without action being taken. This action doesn’t necessarily have to be taken by the individual seeking the result. Often times, things come to us of their own accord. In reality though, our good fortune is merely the result of activities undertaken in previous lives and also activities performed by other living entities. This supports Lakshmana’s argument. A result cannot be achieved without action. Therefore Lakshmana is advising Rama to take the necessary steps to find and rescue Sita. Without someone taking this action, Sita’s rescue would never happen. Lord Rama would heed this wonderful advice and eventually find and rescue Sita, thus reuniting with His beloved.
“Even a man of knowledge acts according to his own nature, for everyone follows his nature. What can repression accomplish?” (Lord Krishna, Bg. 3.33)
How can God be satisfied? Again, we can look to the example of Lakshmana. Sita was kidnapped while residing in the forest with Rama and Lakshmana. Lord Rama was only in the forest because of a request made by His father, the King of Ayodhya. Lakshmana and Sita were not requested to go to the forest, so they had no reason to be there. But since they loved Rama so much, they refused to remain in the kingdom alone. For Rama’s satisfaction, they insisted on accompanying the Lord for the duration of His fourteen years of exile in the forest. Many others wanted to go with Rama, but they weren’t given the opportunity. Lakshmana and Sita, through their pure devotion which manifested in tears of love, forced Rama to take them with Him. Goswami Tulsidas references this fact in his Dohavali. He states that Sita and Lakshmana were so purified that they were able to accompany Rama, while the other citizens were not. For Lord Rama to allow this, He must have derived great pleasure from their company. This is actually a fact. No one can give more pleasure to the Lord than Sita and Lakshmana can.
