
With every progressive achievement, be it in the area of technology or philosophy, there are tradeoffs, bad things that come along with the good. As the saying goes, “There’s no such thing as a free lunch”, there’s no such thing as advancement without retreat in other areas. The advent of computers and the programming required for their operation serve as great examples in this regard.
For a computer to perform the required tasks for a specific project, it needs to be programmed. Aside from the hardware configuration, at the heart of the device is the operating system, which serves as the foundation for all the functions the computer will perform. The operating system sets the ground rules; it tells you how memory will be allocated, how programs will look and feel, and how quickly operations can be performed. The developers, those who write the programs, need to tailor their programs to the target operating system. In the early days of computers, there was no such thing as Windows, or a system with a user-friendly graphical interface that allowed for the use of a mouse. All input/output was performed through terminal systems which had limited features as far as visuals were concerned. Not only were programs written to run on these terminal systems, but the development was done on these machines as well. Writing a program involves adhering to the syntactical and semantic constructs of the language being used, which means that the computer scientist must know how to declare and assign variables, write and call functions, and properly perform assignment and loop operations. Program languages are generally locked down very tight, so the slightest mistake in coding syntax will result in a compiler error. An error during the compilation of the program prevents the program from ever becoming an executable, meaning that the program can never be used by anyone unless and until all compiler errors are fixed.
While it is much easier to write a program these days, there are inherent tradeoffs, some of which are quite unpleasant. Since the newer operating systems do much of the work in the background for you, they are generally slower in completing their operations. This means that the same program written on a terminal system could run much faster than it would on a Windows-based system. This may not make a difference for a simple user-interface program that doesn’t process many requests, but for a larger program that say is parsing through very large files, the difference in execution times is quite notable. Another issue that is managed automatically on the newer systems is memory. Depending on the hardware configuration of a computer, there is a set amount of memory that can be allocated to all the concurrently executing programs. In this scenario, memory management is quite important, for you don’t want a program to eat up memory that it doesn’t need, but you also want it to have enough memory to perform its necessary functions. In the past, memory management was an art form, something handled explicitly by the developer in their code. The newer systems have garbage collection mechanisms where dynamic memory management is taken care of behind the scenes. While this is beneficial most of the time, memory leak issues can arise, causing the computer to crash. These issues aren’t easily diagnosed either since the memory management is not handled explicitly in the code.
Chanting this mantra, whether out loud [kirtana] or to one self [japa], is considered the only religious practice worth adopting for the people of this age. Since this method is a little different from the methods of ages past, we could classify it as an advancement, the moving forward of religious practice. After all, everyone seems to be intrigued by the idea of evolution, the concept of coming up with a better, smarter way of doing something in comparison to the methods employed by generations past. While advancements in other areas of life certainly do bring tradeoffs, this is not the case with chanting Hare Krishna.
Yet for the people of this age, even reading is too much of a chore. There is so much time spent maintaining the body for satisfying the senses that there is really no inclination for reading all of Vyasadeva’s works. For this reason, the chanting process was inaugurated. Simply chant Hare Krishna wherever you go and you will always be in connection with God. With this system, it seems that a potential tradeoff could be the decrease in intelligence. In days past, by either reading books or hearing the shrutis, a person could become an expert Sanskrit scholar, acquiring knowledge about the soul and its constitutional position in relation to God. With this new system, it appears that no one will be able to learn Sanskrit or deep philosophy since they are just chanting all the time.
“Thus established in the mode of unalloyed goodness, the man whose mind has been enlivened by contact with devotional service to the Lord [bhagavad-bhakti-yogatah] gains positive scientific knowledge of the Personality of Godhead in the stage of liberation from all material association.” (Shrimad Bhagavatam, 1.2.20)
Bhakti means love or devotion, and the term taken on its own doesn’t really have much significance. We can love our dog, cat, family member, nation, or community, but this love doesn’t really advance the condition of the soul. The soul is the basis of our identity, an identity which is never removed. The soul always exists, even through birth and death. In order to further the condition of the spirit soul, bhakti needs to be directed in the right area, it needs to be purified. Bhagavad-bhakti is the discipline which directs our love and devotion to Bhagavan, which is another name for God. Bhaga refers to fortunes, so Bhagavan is one who possesses all fortunes. This is a very nice term to describe God because no conditioned living entity can meet these requirements. Those who direct their bhakti towards Bhagavan also become fortunate. If God is fortunate, then obviously anyone who loves Him purely will be equally as fortunate. This is why sometimes great devotees like Narada Muni and Lord Shiva are also referred to as Bhagavan.
The sankirtana movement inaugurated by Lord Chaitanya Mahaprabhu, Krishna’s incarnation as a preacher, represents advancement and simplification. This is a feature unique to the spiritual discipline of bhagavad-bhakti, for no material advancement is free of tradeoffs. Lord Chaitanya, by establishing the supremacy of the engagement known as devotional service, showed us the way. We simply require the good sense to follow His lead.
